E-learning Basics

eLearning uses learning management systems (such as Blackboard, WebCT, KEWL, etc.) as a web-based platform for distributing and facilitating the eLearning curricula. Learning management systems allow for effective use of the Web for learning by:
Providing access to rich sources of information.
Encouraging meaningful interactions with content.
Bringing people together to challenge, support, or respond to each other.
Exemplary eLearning courses should have the following aspects:
eLectures – eLectures provide crucial concept or technique that students need in order to apply it to a problem or discussion.
Discussion Forum – This is where online interaction takes place for each course. You will be expected to initiate a discussion and post replies.
Ask an expert – In addition to the local learning facilitator, you will have access to an expert practitioner for each course. This expert practitioner will be available to generate discussion about a particular topic and to respond to questions.
Mentorship – If you require an online mentor who is a professional in a particular subject area and who can provide ongoing feedback let your course instructor know so we can help locate an online mentor for you.
Local learning facilitator or tutor support – A local learning facilitators and/or lecturer will be available for face to face interaction at your Home Institution.
Access to network resources - Additional reading materials relevant to your course are located in “Course documents”. Moreover, some assignments will require that you locate material on the Internet for sharing in the conference room or discussion forum.
Structured group activity – You will be expected to participate in a combination of the following structured group activities: seminars, small group discussions, learning partnerships and dyads, student work groups and learning circles, team presentations, simulations or role plays, and peer learning groups. Please get some guidance from your course instructor or local learning facilitator.
Informal peer interaction -- Sometimes the best learning occurs during informal peer interaction so please email each other if you require private space.
Connected Education
Of the various related terms and definitions, I appreciate Steven Gilbert (2000:15) vision of connected education. “In this vision of education, individual learners, teachers, and related support professionals connect better to information, ideas and each other via effective combinations of pedagogy and technology – both old and new.” Gilbert continues that “within the context of the institution’s educational mission, all have more opportunities to connect with each other’s efforts to identify, understand, develop, and improve effective combinations of:
Learners’ capabilities, needs, and goals;
Teachers’ capabilities, needs, and goals;
Academic content;
Approaches to teaching and learning (pedagogy);
Media and applications of technology; and
Assessment and Feedback.”
e-Quality: Access to Quality eLearning
Before we proceed, let's take some time to look at quality assurance concerns that started to be voiced as more traditional universities started to offer Internet-based distance learning and as more private sector entities started to offer diplomas based entirely on computer-mediated learning. The eight regional accrediting commissions which assure the quality of the great majority of degree-granting institutions of higher learning in the United States issued a statement of commitment about their resolve to sustain certain values in the face of greater movement towards Internet-based distance learning (not as we have defined eLearning above). These values are:
that education is best experienced within a community of learning where competent professionals are actively and cooperatively involved with creating, providing, and improving the instructional program;
that learning is dynamic and interactive, regardless of the setting in which it occurs;
that instructional programs leading to degrees having integrity are organized around substantive and coherent curricula which define expected learning outcomes;
that institutions accept the obligation to address student needs related to, and to provide the resources necessary for, their academic success;
that institutions are responsible for the education provided in their name;
that institutions undertake the assessment and improvement of their quality, giving particular emphasis to student learning;
that institutions voluntarily subject themselves to peer review.
Based on an initial draft by the Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications (http://www.wiche.edu/telecom/), the eight regional accrediting commissions offered the following best practices to reflect the “common understandings of those elements that reflect quality distance education programming.” The best practices are meant to assist institutions in planning distance education activities and to provide a self-assessment framework for those already nvolved and are intended to inform and facilitate the evaluation policies and processes of each region. These Best Practices are divided into five separate components, each of which addresses a particular area of institutional activity relevant to distance education. They are:
Institutional Context and Commitment
Curriculum and Instruction
Faculty Support
Student Support
Evaluation and Assessment
Blackboard Inc and the U.S. National Education Association (NEA) commissioned a study on “Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based Distance Education”. The study set out to validate a set of benchmarks applicable to Internet-based distance education.The study outcome is a list of 24 benchmarks, grouped under seven general categories that are essential to ensure quality in Internet-based distance education. The seven categories are:
Institutional Support Benchmarks
Course Development Benchmarks
Teaching/Learning Benchmarks
Course Structure Benchmarks
Student Support Benchmarks
Faculty Support Benchmarks
Evaluation and Assessment Benchmarks